AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Ozymandias by percy bysshe shelley analysis11/29/2022 ![]() ![]() At the “center” (is there a center? Paging Jacques Derrida …) floats the pharaoh, a transient human mystery whose meaning is interpreted and solidified by the sculptor who recreates him in stone. (I like to compare it to a Turducken.) The multiple voices, perspectives, and subjectivities nestled inside are similarly intricate and mind-boggling. Fry won’t deny that “Ozymandias” has an ironic soul, but he locates its mischief in an elaborate game Shelley is playing-on the reader.Ĭritics like to compare Shelley’s sonnet to one of those Chinese boxes that contain ever-smaller replicas of themselves. ![]() Joke’s on you, Oz! Can I call you Oz? Who cares! You’re just some rubble in the desert.Įxcept, according to the Romantic scholar Paul Fry, the poem is up to something far more complex than poking fun at a pharaoh’s empty dreams of immortality. “Shattered” and “half sunk,” the “wreck” languishes in “lone and level sands.” Given Shelley’s anti-imperial leanings, the scornful takeaway seems obvious: So much for all that arrogant posturing. The sculpted likeness, which bears his “wrinkled lip” and “sneer of cold command,” is inscribed with a boast: “My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings / Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!” By the time we encounter the colossus, though, it has fallen into ruin. A great tyrant, otherwise known as Egyptian pharaoh Ramses II, has apparently commissioned a monument to his lofty works. We’d always thought of “Ozymandias” as a textbook example of dramatic irony-the gulf in understanding between a character speaking lines and an audience hearing them. As we prepared to put away our notes from high school English class, though, we had a “You’re Doing It Wrong: Shelley” moment. Here at Brow Beat, Sharan Shetty made a case for why “Ozymandias” and Breaking Bad go together like ephedrine and red phosphorus: Both center on figures of passionate, monomaniacal ambition both explore the (weirdly seductive, or at least commanding) nature of evil, especially as pitted against a more impersonal but equally violent power-time. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |